2

Technical question regarding mic cables:

What is your favorite type, and why?

I shot out a few kinds and I found Monster Cable to be the best overall for my purposes of recording voice and vocals.

Has anyone found anything better? What type of cables do you use for recording?

Thanks in advance, as always! All of your experience is always greatly appreciated!

12
  • Was it a blind comparison?
    – endolith
    Commented Sep 24, 2010 at 21:50
  • @Endolith Yes, it was.
    – Utopia
    Commented Sep 24, 2010 at 22:37
  • 1
    Using the same cables as a great audio engineer won't make you a great audio engineer.
    – endolith
    Commented Sep 27, 2010 at 20:49
  • 1
    @endolith That's true, but it's a good start. Do you always doubt the opinions of professionals?
    – Utopia
    Commented Sep 27, 2010 at 21:10
  • 4
    Let's start the 48k vs 96k argument next and see some more professional opnions :)
    – VCProd
    Commented Sep 28, 2010 at 19:39

15 Answers 15

15

If your Monster Cable changes the actual sound of the recording, I'd throw it away or demand a new one. It's copper, nothing else. Nothing about it should (or could really) change the sound. The point of a cable is to just get from point A to point B without coloring the sound. If your cable is coloring the sound, you're in trouble. If your cable can color the sound, then the longer the cable, the more it would color, and all sorts of problems would occur at longer cable runs.

If you do a true, 100% honest blind test, I guarantee you won't be able to tell the difference between a Monster and something like a Whirlwind or other cheaper brand. IMO, the only reason to buy Monster is because of the warrantee (which is amazing). For the price, though, you could get a much better construction on a cable - something like Mogami or Canari.

The stuff Monster puts on their packaging might be true in a lab with an oscilloscope, but nothing that the human ear can discern. If you can discern it, you are suffering the same problem that occurs when you turn an eq, hear a difference, then later come to find out the eq was never inline in the first place. Your brain wants to hear a difference, so it makes you hear one.

Same thing goes for those $300 IEC cables and such. It's power. As long as you're plugged into a conditioner, it's not going to change the sound of your gear.

So, in short, the thing you want in a cable is good construction and good noise reduction. In general, the quad-star type cables are the best at noise reduction, so I'd go with that. Mid-level Mogami or Canari does just fine. And, if you buy it bulk and solder it yourself, you can get a lot of it for cheap. Monster is fine too, just don't buy the holy-crap expensive stuff. Isn't worth it.

Edit:

Check this out too. Not studio audio, but Audiophile level, but the same idea: Monster A/B

Edit 2:

In case money is no issue and you just want to have the coolest out there (regardless of an increase in function or not), here's some gear pr0n for you to look at: alt text
(source: jpslabs.com)

(JPS Labs Aluminata XLR Interconnect)

16
  • 1
    For very long runs, you might be hearing a difference in the preservation of the sound and noise reduction. Any good quality cable will do. I'd still stay away from Monster. Way overpriced and they're not a very nice company. Also, check out the link I've added to the bottom of my post.
    – Colin Hart
    Commented Sep 25, 2010 at 4:08
  • 2
    i vote coat hangers.
    – georgi
    Commented Sep 25, 2010 at 12:31
  • 1
    @VCProd: That's awesome. There's a few stories out there like that. Monster just likes screwing people. @georgi.m, @Ryan, @endolith, @VCProd - added some gear pr0n to the post in case you're interested...
    – Colin Hart
    Commented Sep 27, 2010 at 3:59
  • 2
    They should call them Alluminati, so you feel like you've just joined a secret society. Commented Sep 27, 2010 at 4:18
  • 1
    "I can send you my recordings if you'd like. There is a definite quality difference..." Multiple recordings of the same sound with identical mics in identical position through different cables, and with a definite quality difference? I'd like to see those.
    – endolith
    Commented Sep 27, 2010 at 20:45
7

My favorite type of mic cables are the ones that work! I especially like them if they work even after they've been dragged through the mud, gaffer taped to cars, baked in the sun etc.... No matter how good the sales pitch is or whether they sound 0.0001% better when plugged into a preamp with wooden knobs, if a cable fails it fails 100% and there may never be a take 2, ever.

6

Years ago, I worked at Guitar Center. Monster Cable was the best at one thing; making us more money than any other cable. The Monster Cable reps were like used carsalesmen, management pushed us to sell that stuff as much as possible. It was the only thing in the store sold at full retail price. Not even the store manager could sell it for less. The markup was insane.

9
  • 1
    I also used to work at Guitar Center. Same experience here.
    – Colin Hart
    Commented Sep 25, 2010 at 19:01
  • 2
    If you want the best cable, at the lowest price, buy bulk canare, belden, mogami, etc. Buy some neutrik or switchcraft connectors and solder your own. Alternatively, check out places like redco.com for custom builds. Personally, I've never had an issue with brands like whirlwind and Proco. For snakes for my PT system I bought Digidesign snakes, they were the cheapest and quality is fine. Only cables I've ever had issue with are Hosa. Commented Sep 25, 2010 at 19:50
  • 1
    I walked into a music store in LA a few days ago to pick up a 3' cable. Before I'd finished saying "XLR," the rep was steering me toward the Monster rack. He implied that they didn't have any (short) non-Monster cables. It took him a minute of my not going for it before he remembered another rack with less-exorbitantly-priced stuff. @Chuck What was the specific issue with Hosa?
    – Tyler
    Commented Sep 25, 2010 at 20:05
  • 1
    @Ryan $9/foot?? West Penn 77291 is $122 for 1000 feet, plus $3/connector. Cheap cheap cable, great great quality.
    – VCProd
    Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 1:45
  • 1
    @Tyler Hosa are cheap with cheap construction. I've used them without issue, but I've also had some develop shorts. For slightly more money, you can get better constructed cable that is easier to repair (should you need to). Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 2:21
4

While many swear by Mogami - I have a few for long runs - most of mine are Canare starquads, and all of them use neutrik connectors, and like Chuck, I've got a few Whirlwinds for special uses (like one-footers for runs from bag wireless units). Nary a problem, but I've got a dozen years' worth of cable purchases that are weak, broken, frayed, noisy, poorly-shielded, verbally abusive, and generally crapulent. Once I discovered Canare and Mogami, no looking back, and no problems unless I do something really stupid.

I can't hear any difference between the good brands I just mentioned.

3
  • @Nathan I have some Canare starquad cables that I build for myself and have had zero problems with them. I also have at least a couple hundred feet of Canare starquad cable on rolls that I've been meaning to build into cables. It's only been 5 years, I'll get to it eventually :) Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 2:24
  • 1
    I misread, "have been verbally abused." And I thought, yeah man, nothing will cut a cable's life expectancy than low self esteem. :)
    – MtL
    Commented Sep 28, 2010 at 15:37
  • ROFLMAO, @MtL! :-) Commented Sep 28, 2010 at 18:47
3

If you want good quality, make your own cables. You have full control over how it is shielded and terminated. Like NoiseJockey, I almost always use Caranre starquad cable - I have a reel of 1000 feet that I use as my starter cable. From there, I depends on the application for the connector - I generally use Neutric connectors, XX series. If you're not comfortable with soldering, they have a Crimp Series XX. If you're want pretty cables, you can use the CrystalICON Series that are studded with Swarovski crystals. I wish that was a joke.

There are lots of claims that go around involving the noticeable quality of sound with different connectors, low oxygen copper, etc. The only thing that should be noticeable is any interference, in which case you need to look at your grounding practices.

7
  • It's very interesting, the opinions on this matter. I feel like I have opened a pandora's box by asking it. It's good material to chew and discuss on. I'm curious: If cables sound the same, then why are some solid-state mixboard channels so drastically different? Copper vs copper, transformer vs. tranformer, right? So a Neve transformer should sound the same as a Mackie transformer. Right?
    – Utopia
    Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 2:05
  • 2
    Eh, there have just been a lot of wild claims about "boutique" or "premium" audio gear and 99% of it is just fancy sales talk. If it were just copper, they should be the same, but tranformers have different wrap patterns and whatnot that make them unique. If you're just talking about point A to point B, copper is copper. You need the right gaugue and grounding for your application, but the copper is not to blame (or give merit to). Here is a great (mind-melting) white paper on grounding for A/V surgex.com/pdf/PowerGround.pdf - know it, love it :)
    – VCProd
    Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 2:22
  • 1
    a neve transformer should sound different than a mackie transformer, unless the design was copied/licensed/rebranded. nothing to do with copper wire.
    – georgi
    Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 10:56
  • @georgi.m But what's all the talk about the phase shifting of long cables with Monster being made to have the highs arrive at whatever time with the lows taking a longer time or whatever their secret is. I think that has some difference in it than copper - plus those tests were done with like a foot-long run of cable, right? Not 50 feet or even 10 feet?
    – Utopia
    Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 20:41
  • 1
    @Ryan, you trust salesmen way too much.
    – endolith
    Commented Sep 27, 2010 at 20:40
3

My favorite kind is the one that reaches sufficiently from point A to point B and all the pins on one end are the same as the other.

2

Professionals for the most part use Canare with Neutrik ends. The cable should not make any difference in the sound, but the build quality is important especially for film sound folks like me. Your brain might trick you into thinking that cables sound different, but through years of treating cables like the commodity they are I've never paid them much mind. The thing has to work, and if it doesn't you should have a backup ready to fly in. Also as an older mixer than myself once said "if something is wrong you will know it." If you're running such long lengths of cable you might want to look into remote preamps, or placing the preamps closer to the source and running a line level the rest of the way. That would make much more of a difference. Frankly if shielding wasn't an issue I'm sure lamp cord would do the trick just fine.

1

MIT makes great XLRs and interconnects. But for 100' runs... ayeee... would be way to pricey.

1

Good cables are the ones that don't fail, don't get curled and are nice to handle without making you all dirty. Testing with very long cables on a cable drum or coiled up could possibly be a problem as inductance might be caused.

Otherwise I trust Paul Frindle, SSL analog console designer (E,G types), Sony Oxford designer, Sonnox plugins original designer. I'll find his quote later but essentially a wire is a wire, even with extremely long runs nothing but interference (depends on shielding and cable run design) and a VERY slight HF rolloff can occur. the cable lengths to make that HF roll off to be of importance is almost rediculous.

0

Can't go wrong with the monster gold-tips. They're shielded better to reduce any noise. All around a good buy.

0
0

Different cables definitely can sound different. Anybody who says otherwise simply doesn't know what they are talking about. All you have to do is listen to a good stereo and try a few different brands connecting the CD player to the amp. The differences are obvious. The people who say "it's just copper" simply haven't sat down and tested it out. I'm not saying it makes perfect sense, I'm just saying, it's true. Good luck with your search. I'm searching for the best sounding mic cable right now myself.

1
  • By the way, Monster is not serious cable, if you're talking about a stereo. I doubt their pro gear is any better.
    – hukkfinn
    Commented Feb 8, 2011 at 21:59
0

The answer from Steve Urban is spot on! If the signal can go from the source and into my console with the levels I expect, and the resulting sound is okay the cable is good enough. This has been my experience from live settings for the past 20 years or so.

Whenever I need new cables I want Neutrik plugs, but don't really care about the cable. I'll go for whatever is black, available and with the correct number of conductors.

-1

this is silly. More air mattress wind Ryan, that was awesome!

-1

I started using Pro Co Ameriquad cable for mic for karaoke singing...I found the difference in the cable I used earlier ones and this one..The difference is clarity, no noise, and excellent and clear sound...I dont have any problem with this..company says ' use or abuse' we will exchange free...I saw a price of $26.75 for 10 foot cable and was browsing for lower price...Zzsounds.com had it for same price $26.75.. when I wanted to place order next day on Amazon.com, I saw the price at $44.95, when went back to Zzsounds.com saw the same $26.75 still on...instead of a patch cord, I ordered 2 of this 10 foot for mic to pre-amp and pre-amp to sound mixer. I do find a quality difference! Instead of going for 3 or 4 times cheaper ones, lets go for 1 cable which would serve us long time..

-5

We buy Mogami cable and Neutrik connectors in bulk and roll our own mic/line/instrument cables for our studio. We've also done some blind shootouts, and can assure you that different brands of cable absolutely do sound different from each other. I use the word "different" because "better" is subjective. That said, in our tests we all chose Mogami hands down over ProCo and Whirlwind. We felt that the Mogami cable offered less comb filtering in the high frequencies (some may describe this as being "smoother" in the highs) and extended, even low frequency response on kick and bass.

6
  • 2
    Comb filtering? Are your mic cables several miles long? o_O
    – endolith
    Commented Sep 25, 2010 at 14:56
  • 3
    having studied electronics i'm voting this down to keep my sanity.
    – georgi
    Commented Sep 25, 2010 at 16:38
  • Oakwood - Thanks and I had the same experience. I guess it's an audiophile thing.
    – Utopia
    Commented Sep 25, 2010 at 19:22
  • Isn't everyone here an audiophile?? Commented Sep 27, 2010 at 7:10
  • But what about the skin effect?!?!
    – VCProd
    Commented Sep 27, 2010 at 14:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.