Timeline for Editing/Mastering workflow for a podcast
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 at 15:19 | history | migrated | from video.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Mar 13, 2012 at 15:23 | answer | added | JohnnyCanuck | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 22, 2011 at 2:27 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 18, 2011 at 20:04 | answer | added | Michael | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 11:53 | comment | added | Rory Alsop♦ | the high/low pass filters are useful here - gets you better quality at the same bit rate mp3. | |
| Oct 12, 2011 at 14:31 | comment | added | Ian Dunn | I don't understand all the reasons behind it, but I've seen it recommended a few times. I think part of it is that the MP3 encoder is going to ditch frequencies that the human ear can't hear anyway, and that the encoder will be able to create a better sounding file if it has less data to analyse from the start. I've heard recommendations to throw out anything below 80hZ or above 11khZ. What do you think? | |
| Oct 11, 2011 at 21:23 | comment | added | Warrior Bob | Why the high/lowpass filters in Editing steps 5 and 6? | |
| Oct 7, 2011 at 11:48 | comment | added | Rory Alsop♦ | That looks like it should work fine for a podcast | |
| Oct 6, 2011 at 23:50 | history | asked | Ian Dunn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |