Timeline for M/S mic options
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2010 at 6:28 | comment | added | Chuck Russom | Not sure, I was actually referring to the Colette series as a Schoeps MS rig. Same rig as Michael Raphael runs. | |
| May 12, 2010 at 0:20 | comment | added | Colin Hart | Chuck, is the XLR connector in there a 5pin? I assume so, but it doesn't specify on the Schoeps site | |
| May 9, 2010 at 18:40 | comment | added | Chuck Russom | The 190 is also a great mic. I have never compared the two myself. The 190 is supposed to have more low end response than the 191. I think John Fasal still uses one, or maybe he uses the 191, or maybe both.. I can't remember. | |
| May 9, 2010 at 18:00 | comment | added | NoiseJockey | The MKH40 and MKH30 is the de-facto standard for nature recordists and those who record stereo ambiences. Don't forget, though, that the Rycote, cabling, and accessories can add up to the cost of one of the mics themselves. Biggest plus about this combo is, of course, its freakishly low noise floor for the size of the condensers. | |
| May 9, 2010 at 14:45 | comment | added | Josh McHugh | Love the MKH30/40 setup. | |
| May 9, 2010 at 14:29 | comment | added | Jay Jennings | Great post, Chuck. I hear people talk about the 191 all the time, but what about the 190? (For FX recording, primarily) | |
| May 9, 2010 at 11:23 | history | edited | user80 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added tag, weblinks and image
|
| May 9, 2010 at 8:34 | comment | added | Chuck Russom | Also wanted to add; the Sanken CSS-5 stereo shotgun is another one to consider. Charles Maynes swears by his. | |
| May 9, 2010 at 8:32 | history | answered | Chuck Russom | CC BY-SA 2.5 |