Timeline for I there a name for an effect that periodically fastens the signal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2022 at 7:19 | history | edited | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 110 characters in body
|
| Sep 11, 2022 at 1:13 | history | edited | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Sep 11, 2022 at 0:53 | history | edited | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Sep 11, 2022 at 0:42 | history | edited | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Sep 11, 2022 at 0:35 | comment | added | n00dles♦ | @LerianAcosenossa I updated answer with some examples ;) | |
| Sep 11, 2022 at 0:30 | history | edited | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added more detail and tried to make more clear
|
| Sep 11, 2022 at 0:21 | history | edited | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added more detail and tried to make more clear
|
| Sep 10, 2022 at 21:10 | comment | added | Lerian Acosenossa | I'm not familiar with frequency modulation, but I suppose I understand the concept now, obviously is famous by its acrononymous FM, but I haven't saw that coming and I still don't see what multiplying frequencies has to do with the speed of the signal, theoritically you are only pitch shifting over periods of time but that shouldm't affect the time that a sound would show up, it would only make it sound lower and higher over time, what is a consequence of altering speed but not the main factor. Throw me an example, just in case. | |
| Sep 10, 2022 at 20:53 | comment | added | n00dles♦ | @LerianAcosenossa Hi Lerian. My answer does exactly that. I think you're thinking of Amplitude Modulation. This is Frequency Modulation. Frequency = "speed". Maybe I should have made it more clear. Would you like me to show you how it works? I'll knock up a quick example if you like. | |
| Sep 10, 2022 at 20:40 | comment | added | Lerian Acosenossa | And btw I'm neither sure if t'=kt² but surely it would be a time map function like that | |
| Sep 10, 2022 at 20:40 | comment | added | Lerian Acosenossa | I'm sad to tell you that you're totally wrong this time, you didn't take my analogy. I said like fade in/fade out but with time instead of amplitude, these means I'm affecting speed and not perceived volume, you get me now? I know what modulation is and it generally affects volume, your sawtooth effect is a clear example of a periodic fade in, but I'm not interested in that. In more simple words, I want an effect similar of that of the sawtooth but rather affecting speed not volume, so the sawtooth would be the speed in function of time instead of peak in function of time. | |
| Sep 10, 2022 at 16:02 | history | edited | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2022 at 15:57 | history | edited | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2022 at 15:41 | history | edited | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2022 at 15:32 | history | answered | n00dles♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |