Timeline for What are the best practices for sequencing the Isotope RX7 Standard toolset for dialogue audio restoration?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2019 at 18:23 | vote | accept | rambommakanti | ||
| Oct 30, 2019 at 18:20 | comment | added | rambommakanti | Confirms my suspicion and validates some differences between files - many thanks Mark for the lead! much appreciate the help... | |
| Oct 30, 2019 at 11:41 | history | edited | Mark | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 152 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2019 at 11:27 | comment | added | Mark | Yes, in retrospect I think you will benefit from removing DC prior to declip - simply because of the way that declip works in izotope. The declip usually works symmetrically around the signal level centre. | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 23:58 | comment | added | rambommakanti | It is an excellent suggestion to use EQ for the 8k band...and yes, per your suggestion in earlier thread, going very gentle with noise slices - 2dB at a time | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 22:36 | comment | added | rambommakanti | Mark - above approach has been built upon your recommendation @ sound.stackexchange.com/questions/46417/…. Very grateful for the tool suggestion as well as the strategy. For files at hand, 80% of the value appears to be from declip - Izotope is unbelievable in recreation!!! Just wondering if a dc offset in data affects the declip algorithm adversely...in which case I can do dehum first. Thanks! | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 21:44 | history | answered | Mark | CC BY-SA 4.0 |