Timeline for Why sample at 196kHz when human ear can only hear within a 20kHz range?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2022 at 17:11 | comment | added | Tomachi | At the analog to digital conversion, all frequencies above 20 khz are filtered out by an analog circuit. Unless you can hear a relay clicking when you switch from 48 khz to 192 khz, you won't be able to record a dog whistle and slow it down to hear it. | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:47 | answer | added | Melloj | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 11, 2016 at 17:24 | answer | added | José David | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 11, 2016 at 16:47 | answer | added | user19416 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 11, 2016 at 15:47 | answer | added | n00dles♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 11, 2016 at 9:01 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 17:12 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 19, 2016 at 3:02 | |||||
| Oct 10, 2016 at 16:58 | comment | added | user9881 | Did you find any research on this topic yet? If so, was it hard to understand in some specific way? | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 15:25 | comment | added | Linuxios | It should be noted that a lot of highly regarded DSP coders, sound designers, and so on believe that sampling at a higher rate than 48kHz (maximum frequency of 24kHz, so you get some safety buffer) is ridiculous for any application where the final destination is the human ear. There are some very good technical (and not so technical) write ups about this on the web, you might want to google. | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 3:22 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 10, 2016 at 16:58 | |||||
| Oct 10, 2016 at 3:17 | history | asked | Julia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |