Timeline for Using a Rode NTG-2 Shotgun with a Marantz PMD 661
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2016 at 2:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Apr 3, 2016 at 6:26 | |||||
| Sep 18, 2012 at 14:18 | comment | added | pointy stumps | That's a somewhat contentious issue. Many people argue for much higher sample rates, especially if you intend to do serious time-stretching (in particular, slowing things down). Others quotes science that suggests you can't actually hear the difference between higher sample rates. Whatever your belief in this area, 44.1kHz should be your minimum - 'cd quality'. Personally, I'd just record in 48kHz all the way. At least if your work ends up being used in video, you don't have to upsample again. | |
| Sep 18, 2012 at 5:55 | comment | added | RedSonic01 | @Iain McGregor - why should audio only projects use 44.1Khz? | |
| May 31, 2012 at 18:07 | history | answered | user80 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |