14
You're likely to find that artists that have basslines that stick out well on both proper studio monitors as well as crappy laptop speakers are utilizing a bunch of layering of sounds to create a cohesive bass sound that spans various frequencies (besides the low ones you'd expect). Even when I'm using a bass sound that is essentially a sub (sine wave) bass,...
8
Using a higher order filter will give you a greater roll-off slope in the filters stop-band. So a 1st order filter has a roll-off slope of -6db/octave, 2nd order filter has a roll-off slope of -12db/octave, 3rd order filter has a roll-off slope of -18db/octave, 4th order filter has a roll-off slope of -24db/octave, etc. This means the filter does not act ...
6
Your real problem is most likely recording technique and possibly the gear you're using. A good sound recorded properly doesn't need any EQ to sound professional.
Where you place your microphone is the most important thing in capturing a sound and works just like EQing when in the right hands.
5
-- edit --
this question piqued my curiousity enough that I ran a test for the tonebenders podcast. Check out the results here:
https://soundcloud.com/tonebenders-podcast/017-tonebenders-listener-questions-mic-matching-with-izotopes-ozone
-- edi t--
I honestly think this is a good question that's worthy of a little thoughtfulness.
IMO it is possible to eq ...
5
To get the Kickdrum out of Laptopspeakers -> Layer a small click sound, rimshot, hi hat, etc.
To get the Bass out -> layer it with saws or use parallel distortion or fm to get some higher harmonics out
edit: also the right amount of white and pink noise can give the impression of a burst -> helps with those edm genres to give a big bass drop on small ...
4
You can use something like Waves MaxxBass or RBass to create upper harmonics that can be heard on smaller speakers. You could also saturate or distort the mid to high end on a separate track and blend it in with the original.
3
Those combined EQ + spectroscopes can seem a bit misleading. The curve on your EQ isn't always what's actually happening, and similarly metering is only an averaging of the signal because audio is a much faster rate than your monitor. With a regular eq it's really more about using your ears to find something that works. You might be better off using an FFT ...
3
You would probably want to use the insert so the signal passes through the preamp on your mixer before hitting the equalizer.
3
I found boosting the basslines in the 800hz area helps on laptops and only gives a little more clarity on other systems without making it overpowering.
3
There is a logic to your argument, but the problem arises from the fact that there are thousands of models of consumer speaker, all with their own way of 'flattering' the sound.
If you mix on one pair, it may become bass heavy on another.
The idea behind studio monitors is that the sound is as neutral as possible, so that the mix will more or less be ...
2
First of all: An EQ can not add something to a sound that is not there!!!!
This is a very important fact, as a lot of beginners feel like they need to put on a magic frequency response in the EQ to make a sound big or stand out.
But there are roughly 3 situations where you want to use an EQ:
On all of those as a rule of thumb: Wide Q boots and small Q ...
2
It's based on the assumption that studio speakers sound "flat" (and it's technically true as well, because they're designed to sound flat/neutral/clinical/accurate) and thus represent "the average" of all sorts of colorizing. I.e. if the mix is done on a system that sounds "flat", then all colorizing to one direction or another will be less compared to ...
2
This is not possible by traditional, analogue means. As said by Bit Depth, such filters have a property called the order. What that means: the response of a filter of order n can be written as
( an ⋅ ωn + an-1 ⋅ ωn-1 + ... + a2 ⋅ ω2 + a1 ⋅ ω + a0 )
A(ω) = ———————————————————————
( bn ⋅ ωn + bn-1 ⋅ ωn-1 + ... + b2 ⋅ ω2 + b1 ⋅ ω +...
2
No. In fact when using EQ to enhance the tone of a track or fix problems with the track sitting in the mix, the phase shift is often part of the beneficial sonic change created by the EQ. In a live situation, the phase shift caused by EQ can actually provide more gain before feedback.
Phase linear digital EQs can actually sound a little strange becuase the ...
2
The simplest way is to find some free gunshot sound effects online.
If you need to create your own it can be done by layering 2-3 basic sounds. Start with a cookie sheet being hit against something (try to get a few different sounds from the hits). The cookie sheet will give you the metallic sound on top and should be the root sound. The next part of the ...
2
Vocals sound a little dry to me, maybe add some subtle reverb or delay. The method of EQing you're doing sounds right. Dullness usually comes from a lack of top end, maybe add a couple of DBs of top end to the vocals to bring them out a touch.
You could also bring the instruments forwards in the mix, and arrangement wise maybe add a bass instrument of some ...
2
What you're looking for is incredibly hard to implement. Filters always have a slope measured in dB/Octave or dB/Decade and it's a measure of the attenuation of frequencies beyond the cutoff frequency. This slope can never be vertical so frequencies next to each other can never be completely isolated. To increase the slope, we normally stack multiple filters....
2
Very wide open spaces have almost no ambience at all, by their very nature. If you're in the middle of a cornfield with nothing but a few trees or hedges round the edge and just more fields beyond, you've got nothing to reflect from. Sound will just get swallowed up fast.
A playground might have some long early reflection from buildings within a couple of ...
1
For this, I'd mess try Dynamic Spectrum Mapper, iZotope Ozone EQ (that has a matching eq setting) and possibly Logic's Match EQ.
1
Better is pretty subjective :-) but I'd go with automation if the automation is simple. For something more complex I'd go with two tracks with the regions needed for each.
1
In theory the more track you have, the more CPU and memory you use so the more latency you get.
Different settings on the same track seems a wiser solution, but a bit more delicate to achieve.
The tricky part really appears when a software doesn't take in charge properly sudden changes on parameters, the dangers is getting glitches/noises or a too brutal ...
1
Well, there are ways that a signal could be clean, i could experiment with that kind of noise removal.
Just to give an answer , there could be some ways you could remove this sound, one is to try and make it exactly the same, with some noise generators and stuff and put it right underneath and flip the phase.
i believe that the de noiser has really killed ...
1
I guess surgical operations in Izotope RX5 could help a bit, maybe Spectral Repair, but i can't be sure that cloth noise could be removed completely.
1
Well, what i actually listen from just the sound engineer perspective, is the preparation and buildup of the punch.
the punch as a sound itself it just sounds like a sample which is bassy obviously but has a compressor leaving the attack untouched and compressing a bit of the rest so you have a magnified attack.
But think of it this way, we are talking ...
1
Many stereos will generically say their range is from 20hz - 20kHz or somewhere close. This is the range of average human hearing. Each stereo will list somewhere it's frequency response. This is often done in a chart of some kind. In general the increase in volume by adjusting the volume knob would increase all frequencies in the "frequency range" by the ...
1
Yes, you are correct. Low filter shelves low frequencies and high shelve filter shelves high frequencies.
According to manual of your mix, low band is centered at 90Hz and high band is centered at 10kHz.
1
Put the fictional measurements of a phone booth, say 100x100x250 cm, in one of those online room mode calculators
http://www.bobgolds.com/Mode/RoomModes.htm
http://amroc.andymel.eu
and recreate the highest peaks with eq. It will be only half-scientific, but at least you can analyse what such a room would really do with your sound.
1
Nothing definite since I can't play around with it first hand, but what might have happened here is that you put the EQ as an effect on top of the audio file, but didn't render it to permanently change the audio file itself. So, when you go to view the waveform, it's still showing you the original, un-eq'd waveform.
I'm not that familiar with ableton, but I ...
1
Found this on a gearslutz forum a while back (sorry to whoever originally wrote it, credit to you!)
What I used to do was: suspend automation, mess around for a bit,
shift+cmd+c my settings, and then roll back a bit. Enable latch mode,
hit play and then shift+cmd+v the settings. Obviously, this is kind of
a pain and takes longer than it would w/ HD. ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible