It's impossible to tell if your mic is defective, but the recorded audio sounds fine, so I wouldn't expect so.
The Q2U frequency response given by the manufacturer is the frequency response the mic gives when fed with a burst of noise across the audible spectrum which has frequency components of the same amplitude at every frequency across the spectrum. This may have been computed as a delta function fed into a simulation or a real world test/measurement situation. It essentially shows that for any given frequency of a given amplitude (within operational parameters) in the audible spectrum the mic is flat, roughly, between 100Hz - 10Khz ish.
The spectrum of your voice recording is showing what frequency components your voice contains. It looks about right, the peak at 345Hz is around the fundamental of your voice, you may get components a bit lower too. Moving closer to the mic you'll get more proximity effect, ie extra bass response, and conversely as you move further away from the mic this will be less prominent.
The manufacturer graph is a snapshot of how the mic should behave given a flat even spectrum of frequencies. Your voice is giving the mic a complex signal that is far from flat and its profile is what you are measuring in the first graph. If your voice were the sort of signal to produce the response in the second graph it would sound like white noise when you spoke!
You could compare the manufacturers plot with the plot of your voice if you had a second mic with a known good frequency response, and then you would be able to see, maybe, if your mic is behaving close to spec in certain areas with a bit of data extrapolation.
Generally though, your mic sounds fine and the plot is what I would expect for male speech, so I have no reason to suspect it's faulty.