3

Why are microphones used for recording vocals in a studio typically oriented pointing orthogonal to the speaker's mouth, such that the subject is effectively speaking into the side of the mic? I.e. They will point upwards, downwards, or to the side, rather than directly at the mouth of the recording subject.

I get that these mics probably have a cartioid pattern and will still pick up sound from the side, but doesn't having them point anywhere other than directly at the subject result in an increased likelihood of picking up noise from whatever direction they are pointing in?

Examples: enter image description here

enter image description here

3

In almost all microphone designs, it's quite simply because that's the way the diaphragm faces.
A hand-held mic has the diaphragm set at 90° to the body, so you point it at the sound.

enter image description here pic: https://www.soundguys.com/shure-sm7b-review-28438/

The standard large diaphragm condenser as in your photos has it in line with the body, so the pickup pattern is seemingly from 'the side'. Cosmetically, this is why they have really obvious seams & faces, so you don't have to guess which way it's pointing.

enter image description here
pic: https://en-de.neumann.com/u-87-ai

A microphone's pickup pattern is determined as much by the electronic configuration as the diaphragm orientation. A single diaphragm, as in the SM58 is only capable of cardioid pickup - ie, mainly in front. If it could be termed as such, a mic's 'natural state of being' is cardioid.
This type of configuration is built with the diaphragm connected to a wire coil inside a magnet - the same as a loudspeaker - which also dictates its orientation in the mic body. See https://www.shure.com/en-EU/performance-production/louder/how-they-did-it-inside-the-sm58
To get omni or figure 8 pickup you need two diaphragms, set back to back. This already dictates [in the main, there are exceptions] that the diaphragms themselves must be clear of the body & potential interference; hence they 'sit up' from it, in line with the body, rather than being buried into it like a hand-held.

Switchable patterns are enabled by changing the phase characteristics or reducing the gain of one diaphragm in relation to the other, causing areas of sound rejection.
There's a good explanation at https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/microphones-with-switchable-polar-patterns though sadly lacking the diagrams it refers to.

I mentioned exceptions - of which the B&K (now DPA) 4006 is one remarkable exception. It is an omni in a 90° configuration. I have no clue how they actually achieve this, but the results are stunning. Polar pattern changes are achieved not electronically, but by changing the diffuser grid which covers the diaphragm, or with the addition of acoustic 'shapers'.

enter image description here

2
  • A bit of nitpicking on the design on microphone capsules here. An omni is the easy to make - you have one diaphragm and a closed cavity behind it (you need a small hole to adjust to changing air pressure). A figure-8 mic has one diapraghm only - sound entering from the front and back (+ and - direction). Making a cardioid is the most complicated, you need a diaphragm, a small cavity behind it and a backplate with carefully drilled holes. Alternatively you can add one omni + one figure-8 to get a cardoid. Otherwise a good response.
    – ghellquist
    Aug 17 at 21:20
  • @ghellquist - yeah… tbh, I use them not build them, so I kind of companded from a few refs without quite getting the entire detail ;)
    – Tetsujin
    Aug 18 at 8:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.