I just got MXL 990 Heritage Edition, for recording guitar and vocals. However, when opening the box I saw the polar pattern on the box. It's something like this.

Polar pattern

It doesn't fully resemble a cardioid pattern (which I thought I was buying). Does this make an issue for me, in a home studio (not sound isolated, but not the loudest place either). Should I switch to a complete cardioid microphone for best performance, or is it good either way ?

What I know cardioid pattern is:


  • It is tough to judge the 'shape' of the polar plot without knowing the radial axis. Is there a text legend or some such indication of the radial intervals (I only see the 0 dB marking, it is not clear what the other lines are).
    – Thejasvi
    Commented Jul 16, 2022 at 10:18

1 Answer 1


At this page you can find the microphones polar pattern and frequency response (the ones you provided), so you could have possibly found out before buying that the polar pattern is not a “perfect” cardioid.

Now, regarding whether this polar pattern should be called or not a cardioid is somewhat debatable. Personally, I would call that hyper-cardioid, but I am not the one that manufactures it. This being said, to my knowledge, there's no standardization on the naming of the polar patterns of microphones (definitely not of loudspeakers). Although common sense would lead someone to give the title “cardioid” to the polar pattern you provide in the second picture, nothing (apart from their will to follow what is the “unarchived” standard among the industry) stops someone to call whichever polar pattern they want “cardioid” just because to their eyes it resembles a cardioid! I might be wrong about the standardization, but you also have to keep in mind that most (if not all) microphones do not possess a constant polar pattern for all frequencies. Many microphones show a hyper-cardioid like a pattern for a wide frequency range, despite being cardioid in the low frequencies. Thus, the manufacturer may have provided a “mean” polar pattern which is what you see (maybe not, I am just speculating here).

Now, whether this is appropriate for your environment is up to you, the environment, the time of day you record and a whole other bunch of factors. In general, you have to keep in mind that hyper-cardioid microphones (and as I said the microphone you got seems to be close enough to such a pattern) have maximum Direct-to-Random ratio, which means that they provide the maximum “environment isolation” compared to the rest of the polar patterns available (and this is the reason they were first – and still are – used).

Thus, if you would like to get as much isolation as possible, I would say try the one you already have and borrow a cardioid and have a couple of tests. Especially if you like the sound of your microphone I would suggest you stick to it and if you realise that you want more “isolation” try to find a couple of tricks to provide your room with it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.