So youtube-dl shows that YouTube only uses Opus, m4a and vorbis containers. So how do these YouTube to MP3 converters get the MP3 then? Do they transcode from a lossy format? Isn't it better to get the Opus file, as it's the best quality?

closed as off-topic by Tetsujin, Todd Wilcox, audionuma, Rory Alsop May 29 at 7:01

  • This question does not appear to be about sound design, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 3
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about a website/app process, not sound design. – Tetsujin May 12 at 18:27
  • Oh I thought I could use this site as I saw another question about Youtube posted here – Ookami May 12 at 18:41
up vote 0 down vote accepted

It would definitely bet better to get the Opus format since Opus makes better use of the available bitrate and transcoding is a lossy process anyway.

However, MP3 is a format ubiquitously supported by listening devices and thus is a "convenience" format.

Additionally, Youtube changes its preferred format around all of the time. If your library management can deal with different formats, you will likely be best off by taking what youtube-dl delivers (even better would be to use the original upload in whatever format it was but I think that may be only available to the uploader themselves).

Since Youtube is transcoding themselves, the quality of the Opus file might already be compromised more than its nominal bitrate would suggest.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.