I'm creating a podcast with two voice tracks and some intro/outro music, and I'm trying to decide on a general workflow for editing and mastering. Specifically, I'm not sure if some of the effects should be done before or after combining the voices to a single track, and if the music should be combined with the vocal tracks before mastering.


  1. Create a new project in Audacity
  2. Import vocal tracks from audio interface
  3. Remove any mistakes, long pauses, "ums", etc from each individual track
  4. Remove background noise from individual tracks
  5. Run high pass filter effect to cut everything above 11kHz
  6. Run low pass filter to cut everything below 80Hz
  7. Add compression to each track
  8. EQ each track
  9. Manually adjust the volumes of each track so they sound similar
  10. Pan the host's voice track a little bit to the right
  11. Pan the guest's track a little bit to the left
  12. Combine tracks and export to a lossless format


  1. Start a new project in Audacity
  2. Import the combined vocal tracks
  3. Add a little bit of reverb to it
  4. Add the intro/outro music
  5. Run a normalize effect
  6. Check how it sounds on earbuds, make minor tweaks
  7. Export to MP3

Is anything out of order, missing or unnecessary? Do you have any other general suggestions?

  • That looks like it should work fine for a podcast
    – Rory Alsop
    Commented Oct 7, 2011 at 11:48
  • 1
    Why the high/lowpass filters in Editing steps 5 and 6? Commented Oct 11, 2011 at 21:23
  • 1
    I don't understand all the reasons behind it, but I've seen it recommended a few times. I think part of it is that the MP3 encoder is going to ditch frequencies that the human ear can't hear anyway, and that the encoder will be able to create a better sounding file if it has less data to analyse from the start. I've heard recommendations to throw out anything below 80hZ or above 11khZ. What do you think?
    – Ian Dunn
    Commented Oct 12, 2011 at 14:31
  • the high/low pass filters are useful here - gets you better quality at the same bit rate mp3.
    – Rory Alsop
    Commented Nov 1, 2011 at 11:53

2 Answers 2


I currently do a few podcast and have some input on your workflow.

1) You have your high-pass and low-pass terminology backwards. A high-pass filter cuts low frequencies, a low-pass filter cuts high frequencies. Not a big deal, just remember that "low-pass" is only letting the lows pass, and blocking (filtering) everything else.

11 kHz is far, far too low. Your podcast will sound like an old timey telephone conversation. Unless there's a really good reason, you should be leaving the high end alone. Don't cut highs for the sake of cutting them, EQ them down a bit if the track is unnecessarily harsh.

I do usually cut below 60 Hz to cut out mic boom and rumble.

2) I don't pan on a podcast, nor would I recommend doing so. Work with a mono track.

3) I edit out "umms" and pauses after the track is mixed down.

4) Don't add reverb - there's no reason to. The reason one would add reverb to any audio signal is to simulate being in an acoustic environment, which is sometimes desirable for music. Listen to any radio or television broadcast - no reverb. It will make it sound artificial.

  • Thanks for the advice :) Can you explain why you wouldn't recommend panning? My thought was that a subtle difference between the speakers would sound a bit more realistic
    – Ian Dunn
    Commented Nov 19, 2011 at 22:45
  • It may sound more realistic in some listening situations, but I would counter that simulating a real conversation is not the intent of a podcast, the intent is to deliver content and information. Even small differences in panning, especially in back-and-forth conversations, are incredibly noticeable to listeners wearing headphones. I only have anecdotal evidence to offer, but the few times I've seen feedback on panned talk segments, they've been overwhelmingly negative. Listeners can distinguish between talkers based on their voice; panning serves as more of a distraction than a cue.
    – Michael
    Commented Nov 21, 2011 at 14:13
  • Hmm, ok, I've done it before with instruments (e.g., rhythm vs lead guitar) and just assumed the same would hold true for vocals, but you're probably right.
    – Ian Dunn
    Commented Nov 22, 2011 at 2:27
  • Panning is indeed very important in stereo music recordings, and again that's to help simulate listening to music in real life. The rules for what works best in a podcast/spoken word situation are usually different than music recording.
    – Michael
    Commented Nov 22, 2011 at 15:42
  • 1
    I think that panning is more necessary with music because the instruments are generally played at the same time and panning helps to distinguish between the different instruments and prevent them from taking up the same space in the audio spectrum. The voices in a podcast are (usually) not talking at the same time, so panning them would be more of a distraction rather than an enhancement. Commented Apr 5, 2012 at 18:12

Just one suggestion, try to get clean audio as much as possible and then Normalize/Amplify your sound before any of the hi-pass low-pass and filtering adjustments. This will eliminate the tiny, computerised sound that over process and re-processing cause. In other words, do steps 4-8 before 9.

Try using a stage mic (dynamic) over a studio mic (condenser) if your recording room is not studio quality.

Also, have a look at Levelator http://www.conversationsnetwork.org/levelator, I have found that in most cases, it eliminates steps 4-9 altogether.

  • Could you explain your second paragraph, please? Commented Feb 15, 2017 at 2:03
  • 2
    @aparente001, my understanding is that condenser mics tend to pick up a lot of background noise compared to dynamic mics. Dynamic mics will mostly only pick up what's right in front of them, and close. Professional studios can get away with using condenser mics since the rooms are acoustically treated to block outside noise, and then absorb and diffuse internal sounds; but most podcasts are recorded in homes where those treatments aren't practical.
    – Ian Dunn
    Commented Apr 13, 2017 at 1:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.