3

Just ordered a 702 for sfx recording and was wondering if anyone else finds it helpful to pair it with a mixer. It seems slightly unnecessary although I know it could be useful for certain applications. I am recording with a M/S setup. Any thoughts?

Improve this question

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
1

The 702 has a built in MS matrix which is highly flexible. You can decode to your headphones or to "tape". You shouldn't need it if you are just recording 2 channels. That said, I often use the my Sound Devices MP-2 (which has been replaced by the Mix Pre) for channels 3 and 4 on my 744T and I actually find the pres a little more pleasing.

Michael Raphael
http://rabbitearsaudio.com
http://sepulchra.com/blog/

Improve this answer
1
  • Hey Michael, I'm a big fan of your work and your "Rockets" SFX Library is definitely on my next purchase list... I'm aware of the selectable M/S decoding features which is why I love the 702. I guess I was wondering what the advantages are of having a mixer besides being able to trim levels while stuck in a menu and stuff like that.
    – bpert
    Jul 30, 2010 at 16:20
1

I agree with Michael: A 702 for mid-side is enough. That's exactly what I use. The only reason you'd really need a mixer is to mix in more channels or to have better ergonomics and immediacy for riding levels. There are a lot of other reasons to have a 2+ channel SD mixer lying around (pairing with small hand-held recorders like the PCM-D50 or H4n, etc.), but not for what you're aiming to do!

Improve this answer
7
  • Hey NoiseJockey, I'm a big fan of your work and your blog as well!! Your blog definitely gets my creative juices flowing sometimes when I need a boost. I figured that there wasn't really much of an advantage just wanted to see if I was overlooking something. I wasn't sure if menu jockeying was required when the channels are linked to adjust levels when in M/S mode.
    – bpert
    Jul 30, 2010 at 16:28
  • Oh. @bpert, sorry for not getting into that detail: Nope, you just use the two channel gain pots to control the level (L channel) and spread (R channel). Super easy, and you can either record in L-R, decoding in the box, or just monitor in MS and then translate to L-R in post. I've found it to be very fast operation and super easy.
    – NoiseJockey
    Jul 30, 2010 at 19:13
  • So there isn't a need to go back to the channel inputs to balance the levels? I assume you are controlling the gain directly in m/s mode even though they are called level and spread? Sorry just don't have too much experience recording in M/S. I just know that I love how it sounds.
    – bpert
    Jul 30, 2010 at 19:38
  • The control of each channel's gain is done with rotary pots - KNOBS - and not with the menu. The menu affords some additional input sensitivity at a gross level, but 98% of the levels tweaking is done with the two gain knobs on the 702's front panel. In mid-side, the left channel (cardioid mic) determines overall level and the right channel (figure-8 mics) determines the amount of stereo image spread. Your question was whether or not you needed "menu jockeying" to control the levels live when in mid-side mode, and the answer is no. No need for an external mixer in that workflow!
    – NoiseJockey
    Jul 30, 2010 at 19:55
  • @noisejockey do you know if the pre-amps are better than the 702's? If so, by a lot?
    – Andrew Spitz
    Jul 30, 2010 at 22:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.