Timeline for When should you use Arrangement View vs Session View?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 26, 2019 at 18:54 | history | suggested | iono | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix useless title
|
| Sep 25, 2019 at 16:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 26, 2019 at 18:54 | |||||
| Jul 26, 2016 at 23:37 | vote | accept | Chen Jian | ||
| Jul 26, 2016 at 21:28 | vote | accept | Chen Jian | ||
| Jul 26, 2016 at 21:28 | |||||
| Jul 26, 2016 at 21:21 | answer | added | Jonno | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 26, 2016 at 19:34 | answer | added | Dale_G_sound | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 25, 2016 at 15:16 | comment | added | Paulo Pinto | From the Session View section of the manual: ableton.com/en/manual/session-view "In Live’s Arrangement View everything happens along a fixed song timeline. For a number of applications, this is a limiting paradigm. (...) This is exactly what Live’s unique Session View is for." Basically, Session View is optimized for performance. | |
| Jul 24, 2016 at 15:38 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 29, 2016 at 20:18 | |||||
| Jul 24, 2016 at 15:22 | comment | added | Chen Jian | I know, but I am not looking fir the same type if answers I would get there. I am looking for an explanation, not a simple answer, something I won't get there | |
| Jul 24, 2016 at 15:20 | comment | added | Tetsujin | I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this type of question would be far better handled by Ableton's web site or application documentation. This is not Customer Support. | |
| Jul 24, 2016 at 13:01 | history | asked | Chen Jian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |