Sound Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for sound engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

So I have access to a Neumann RSM 191. I was planning on taking it out and seeing what I could capture, but realized that I have no way to decode the MS while recording.

See, I have just a MixPre and an M10 neither of which offers MS decoding or MS linking. So my question is, do I go for the flexibility of MS and just get by with panning Mid = Left, Side = Right and monitor that way, crossing my fingers on mic placement, or do I switch to XY and know that what I'm monitoring is the stereo image I'm recording?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

You don't really need M/S decoding unless you feel you need to monitor in stereo. I'd just go for it, because you can adjust the stereo field to the width you like when you bring it into your DAW later. I did this when I was recording for the DOORS with Tim, and I was pretty happy with the results. I did all of my mic placement based on the Mid signal.

share|improve this answer
Cool, that's what I figured I just didn't want to assume... – Steve Urban Aug 25 '10 at 19:54
Tom Erbe's Matrix+ plug-in works great for decoding in the DAW. It's faster than doing it manually. – bpert Aug 25 '10 at 20:38
@bpert - does that plug-in give you the same control over the width of the stereo image that manual does? – Shaun Farley Aug 25 '10 at 20:46
Just saw this... It allows you to control the volume of the mid and side channels separately while listening in xy stereo or vice versa. – bpert Apr 9 '11 at 0:16

Just my 2 cents, I prefer to use the 191 in XY (100 or 120 degrees). Unless it is a source that I'm not sure if I want to keep stereo. MS gives you the option of trashing the S later and go with mono, which I often do when I use MS. If I'm recording something that moves, I don't tend to use XY. I don't like having sounds moving around the stereo field, unless I mean them to. But for stereo purposes, I'm just happier with the XY vs the MS stuff I've recorded with that mic.

share|improve this answer
Good to know, thanks @Chuck! – Steve Urban Aug 25 '10 at 23:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.