Take the 2-minute tour ×
Sound Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for sound engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

All producers want that world standard sound.

Since production has gone digital, this is possible from a home studio with the right knowledge.

I attempted to achieve the fullness of sound created by top producers. I ended up adding so many sounds and effects that I had a murky clipping production of an album. The frequency was spent.

I know the big answer could be, do more with less. I've come to understand that better.

At the same time, there are still techniques that give sufficient fullness so that one can do more with less e.g. adding reverb with low damp for percussion instruments.

I was wondering what other tricks you know. Another example I can give you to expand is Skrillex. There are a billion Dubstep artists out there using run of the mill Massive synths. He's getting an extremely unique 'fullness' out of his synths.

It means he uses the same programs and same synths doing similar things e.g. using synths in three octaves as the only synth in a powerful section of the song; but he's obviously getting noticably better results.

Please provide me with some of the secrets you've found that could allow me the confidence in doing more with less.

share|improve this question
    
have you tried EQing the different sounds to have each sound fill out a certain frequency range with less overlapping? –  Travis Dtfsu Crum Oct 5 '12 at 13:12
    
Yes, I got very tight with the EQ but perhaps I could take that to greater extremes by using more sounds with automation and letting virtually nothing through but the thinnest portion of the eq band? –  Warren van Rooyen Oct 5 '12 at 13:22
    
One thing I didn't mention in my answer since it was getting really long was the use of 3rd party plugins and effects like distortion, overdrive, formant filters, certain mastering suites, etc. You can email me at thrashart@hotmail.com if you would like to know some of the specific ones used by pros and ones I really like. –  Travis Dtfsu Crum Oct 5 '12 at 14:19
    
disregard the answering questions comment. I don't think I understand exactly what you mean by using more sounds with automation. Taking the EQ to more extremes might work, but generally I don't think this is the case. Actually lowering the EQ on frequencies that aren't necessary is better for removing mud from your mix then raising some to extremes is. Raising the ones you want is still a good idea, but taking it to extremes might not be. –  Travis Dtfsu Crum Oct 5 '12 at 14:35
1  
Play with studio imaging making basses mostly mono and highs mostly stereo. This can usually be done with the built in Utility tool that I think most DAW's have. I know for a fact that Ableton, Logic, and Pro Tools all have a built in plugin that does this –  Travis Dtfsu Crum Oct 5 '12 at 17:01
show 4 more comments

migrated from avp.stackexchange.com Jan 25 at 9:35

This question came from our site for engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts spanning the fields of video, and media creation.

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Here are some techniques and things I used improperly for a long time that I think will help you. Luckily for you, I've researched a lot of techniques for dubstep and EDM in general. And I have a lot of experience with NI Massive.

What I did for a long time was use the EQ too boost the loudness of my instruments which is NOT what you want to do. Using the EQ to effectively layer the sounds is key to removing mud from your track. Some people like to do this with multiband compressors but I find this to change the overall sound sometimes, and if overused, it can peak pretty bad.

One really good technique which most new artists under-use is using the EQ to have each separate sound fill out certain and varied frequency ranges to reduce overlap. For example, what I like to do is have my kick drum raised with the EQ at ~100hz and lowered a decent amount at ~200hz and lowered significantly around 30hz to 60hz. What this does is make room for the common strongest frequencies of the snare (200) and sub bass (30-70). For a more specific and personal touch, I sometimes raise the kick at an extremely high pitch frequency (varies on the song itself) which gives it that slight high pitched punch often used in EDM and lower then the mid ranges very slightly too to make room for my synths and to. Next, I do the same thing as earlier with the frequency specific EQing to the snare and sub but oppositely. Raise the snare ~200hz and lower everything below that a good amount. I like to cut off the really high frequencies on snares but that is just me. Then with the sub, I boost it at 30-70hz and lower everything from 120z and above. Significantly so on the higher frequencies. Also for almost every sound in my song that isn't a kick drum, snare, or sub, I lower the frequencies at ~200hz and ~120hz and below. What this does is remove the overlap from the different sounds giving more room for the bass, kick drum, and snare.

Another thing to take note of is the overall image of the song. Generally highs are set to be mostly stereo with limited mono. Then with lows, are generally mostly mono, with very limited stereo. This is a technique I discovered fairly recently which has helped immensely.

Another tool that is underused, misunderstood, or overlooked by beginners is compressing sounds with a wide gain range. I'd do some research into how a compressor works exactly and when to use it. But to put it simply a compressor controls the peak and range of an individual track's gain level. Think of it as squashing the gain to fit within a certain range.

Specifically with dubstep (brostep actually, but don't mind the name even though it was created as an insult) growls or wobbles, I do the same as above (lower at 100 and 200) but raise it in between 100 and 200 to give it a little punch and then raise it again in the mid tones from 250-500hz or above. I tend to have a separate synth designated as the sub for wobbles and growls so that a sub oscillator within those synths will not distort the others. With non dubstep songs, I try to keep the mid range sounds separate from the typical dubstep sound range by generally not increasing it between 100 and 200hz. This really depends on preference and the specific song. Heck, it could sound great even in a trance song which typically aren't known for having overly strong bass levels.

The mix-down styles will vary from genre to genre and will depend on what samples or recordings you are using. Always use a spectrum analyzer to check the peaks of each sound and to find where some unwanted frequencies are. That is a key element to all of my mixing. Using compressors correctly will generally fix the peaking problem a lot of beginners have when mixing. Just be careful not to overuse compressors. I know many people who advised me to compress every element of my songs just because they were told it was a good idea. They didn't even know why it was a good idea or why they did it.

There are also some techniques specifically used in NI Massive. One is to add a dimension expander effect to do exactly what the name implies. Adding some additional voices under the voicing tab is a good idea too if you want to add more fullness to the sound. On envelope 4 (the gain envelope) a lot of people raise the main level so that the volume stays consistent while the note is held since it set to lower automatically after the initial note is played. One thing Skrillex does a lot with some of his signature sounds is use a hardclipper filter to give them more bite and intensity. Formant oscillators and scream filters are also a commonly used elements in dubstep songs and I personally love them. Don't forget to try out different settings, modulation effects, wave tables position, and amp position for the oscillators too. Also try changing the wave forms, like the default spectrum to bend+, bend+/-, bend-, or formant like I just mentioned.

Another thing to keep in mind is that you don't want to stick with only one synthesizer. FM8 for example is another great NI synth which is actually more often used by Skrillex than massive. Even if you used the exact same filters, effects, and oscillators in Massive as you did in FM8, it would sound totally different. This is because FM8 is an FM synthesizer while Massive is an additive synthesizer. Personally I've been falling in love with FM8 and reFX Nexus 2 and have been using Massive less than I used to.

WOOPS SORRY FOR THE TL;DR BUT TRUST ME IT IS WORTH THE READ.

share|improve this answer
    
edited it because I forgot to specify a few things –  Travis Dtfsu Crum Oct 5 '12 at 14:07
    
I was going to mail you and then saw your incredible response. Thanks. I have no other questions. –  Warren van Rooyen Oct 5 '12 at 17:05
    
no problem, you can still email me if you'd like to know some of the really popular 3rd party plugins. I've researched all of them pretty much haha. –  Travis Dtfsu Crum Oct 5 '12 at 17:16
add comment

A solid understanding of, and lots of experience with mixing is of course difficult to do without. But I wouldn't necessarily consider that a trick.

I think one of the industry standard tricks is TC Electronic's Finalizer.

It uses a combination of frequency based compression, limiters, normalizers, etc. to really fill out the frequency space.

They're not cheap

Although this piece is one of the best known, there are other mastering DSPs that all attempt to do similar things. I would look at mastering equipment to reach for those "radio ready" mixes.

share|improve this answer
    
regarding the TCE Finalizer, there are many techniques and plugins that make that unit obsolete. It is also pretty dang expensive. I meant to put that last part on the question itself instead of in this comment. My bad –  Travis Dtfsu Crum Oct 5 '12 at 14:20
    
Thank you! Much appreciated! –  Warren van Rooyen Oct 5 '12 at 17:06
    
@travis while I'm sure there are many alternatives, I would respectfully disagree that the Finalizer line is obsolete. –  JoshP Oct 5 '12 at 23:23
    
@josh I understand what you mean. I just found that everything the Finalizer does can be done without any outboard equipment and not even close to spending that much money. I may have gone overboard on the obsolete term but that is a pretty common opinion on gearslutz.com –  Travis Dtfsu Crum Oct 6 '12 at 5:24
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.