Sound Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for sound engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What should I be looking for when purchasing a good all-rounder vocal mic?

We've dealt in Shure SM58's for years. Are there other alternatives? What qualities should I be looking for when shopping around?

It's for a medium-budget setup. I would say $200 per microphone would be acceptable. Being used for live vocals in soft rock/pop.

share|improve this question

migrated from Jan 24 '14 at 20:09

This question came from our site for engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts spanning the fields of video, and media creation.

Is this for studio or live work? What type of music? – HatAndBeard Dec 7 '10 at 20:37
Before I read the second sentence, I was going to recommend Shure SM58... it's what I have and I love it, so can't really help. :\ – Andrew Arnold Dec 7 '10 at 20:37
Also, what's your budget look like? There's a pretty large range of prices - are you looking to spend in the hundreds, or thousands? – Rich Bruchal Dec 7 '10 at 20:41
Updated question. Ultimately just a general list of qualities to look for and how important each quality is, and I guess as the budget scales we can start adding more "features" in per mic. – Mark Henderson Dec 7 '10 at 20:45

A part from the classic SM-58, I've had joys with SM-57 and Beta 58. These are all similar, the Beta being the clearest of the lot. These are fine both live and in studio.

Another option is using cheap condenser microphones (I've used the AKG C1000 for instruments and AKG C3000 for voice) which are within your budget and decent for the price. These would be for studio.

share|improve this answer
+1 for the beta 58. Sounds noticeably better and isn't too pricey – davetron5000 Dec 7 '10 at 23:47

For live vocals, I don't think the SM58 can be beat. One of the best (and under-rated) features of it is its durability - it's not going to get damaged easily, even if it's being thrown around the stage by a maniac lead singer.

share|improve this answer
And eventually, it will get thrown...or dropped...or swung around by the cord...or on a stand that'll get kicked get the picture. – chris Dec 7 '10 at 21:23
Agreed, they are very durable. If they get dropped they do dent, but it's not hard to beat the dents out. Good as new. – Benji York Dec 18 '10 at 2:38

As always, mic selection is somewhat subjective, but I've had good experiences with the Sennheiser e Series. You might want to take a look at the e935 & e945 (dynamic) & e865 (condenser) - they would seem to fit your budget. I found them a step up from the 57 & 58 in sound quality. Probably not quite as durable (what is, really?) but they're not fragile either.

share|improve this answer
Used these for years and years in rehearsal (The dynamics). Good durable mics. – Powertieke Dec 8 '10 at 8:34
btw, in average condenser mics are a bit less durable in comparison to dynamic ones – NR4TR Apr 28 '11 at 15:53

My 2 cents:
I use Audix OM5 mics for the backing vocals: good rejection of the drum cymbals on a small stage.
(if it's a really noisy stage, OM7 is even better at it, but more expensive).
Don't expect the clarity, presence & fidelity of a KMS105: the Audix is a ROCK mic.

If you don't know what's coming: SM58Beta can't be beat as an allrounder.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.